All Issue

2018 Vol.17, Issue 4 Preview Page

Research Article

Installation Damage Reduction Factor for Geosynthetics Reinforcements Based on Various Full-Scale Field Installation Tests

다양한 현장내시공성시험에 근거한 토목섬유 보강재의 시공성 감소계수 평가

Sam-Deok Cho1
,
Kwang-Wu Lee2*
조 삼덕1
,
이 광우2*
1Member, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Infrastructure Safety Research, Korea Institute of Civil engineering and building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do 10223, Republic of Korea
2Member, Senior Researcher, Department of Infrastructure Safety Research, Korea Institute of Civil engineering and building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do 10223, Republic of Korea
* Corresponding Author
30 December 2018. pp. 225-238
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

In this paper, to investigate the influence of installation damage, a variety of full-scale field installation tests with 15 geosynthetics reinforcements and fill materials of various grain size distribution have been performed. The full-scale field installation test was conducted with reference to the FHWA (2009) guidelines. The tensile strength tests were performed by sampling up to 20 specimens randomly from the excavated geosynthetics reinforcements after compaction of fill material, and the degree of decrease in tensile strength of reinforcements due to compaction was analyzed based on the experiment results. It was found that the degree of tensile strength reduction of geosynthetics reinforcements due to the compaction of fill material is greatly influenced by the type of reinforcement and the maximum diameter of fill material. In addition, it was found that the strength reduction ratio of PET geogrid (PVC coating) with relatively small stiffness was greatest, and that the larger the maximum grain size of the fill material, the greater the strength reduction ratio. And also, a more reasonable evaluation method for the installation damage reduction factor of geosynthetics reinforcements is proposed based on the results of full-scale field installation tests in present study and the existing test results.

Keywords
Geosynthetics reinforcement
Field installation test
Installation damage
Strength reduction factor

본 연구에서는 토목섬유 보강재의 시공중 손상 정도를 규명하기 위하여 국내에서 많이 사용되고 있는 주요 토목섬유 보강재 제품(7개 사의 15 종류)을 대상으로 다양한 입도의 성토재료를 적용한 현장내시공성시험을 수행하였다. 현장내시공성시험은 FHWA(2009) 지침을 참조하여 수행하였으며, 다짐시공 후 추출된 토목섬유 보강재 시료에서 인장강도 시편(크기 0.2m × 1.4m)을 최대 20개 이상 균등하게 샘플링하여 인장강도시험을 수행함으로써 시공에 따른 인장강도 감소 정도를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 성토재료의 다짐시공으로 인한 토목섬유 보강재의 인장강도 감소 정도는 토목섬유 보강재의 종류와 성토재료의 최대입경에 크게 영향을 받으며, 비교적 강성이 작은 PET 결합형 지오그리드(PVC 코팅)의 인장강도 감소율이 가장 크게 나타났고, 전반적으로 성토재료의 최대입경이 클수록 인장강도 감소율은 더욱 크게 나타남을 알 수 있었다. 또한, 이 시험결과와 함께 기 수행된 현장내시공성시험 결과들을 분석하여 토목섬유 보강재의 시공성 감소계수를 보다 합리적으로 평가할 수 있는 방안을 제시하였다.

References
1
Allen, T. M. and Bathurst, R. J. (1996), “Combined allowable strength reduction factor for geosynthetic creep and installation damage”, Geosynthetics International, Vol.3, No.3, pp.407-439.
10.1680/gein.3.0069
2
ASTM D 5818 (2011), “Standard practices for obtaining samples of geosynthetics from a test section for assessment of installation damage”, Annual Book ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA.
3
Bräu, G. (1996), “Damage of geosynthetics during installation- experience from real sites and research works”, Proc. of the First European Geosynthetics Conference, Maastricht, Vol.1, pp.145-150.
4
BS 8006 (2010), Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills.
5
Cho, S. D., Lee, K. W. and Oh, S. Y. (2005a), “Experimental study for installation damage assessment of geogrid”, Journal of Korea society for Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology, Vol.8, No.1, pp.27-36.
6
Cho, S. D., Lee, K. W., Oh, S. Y. and Lee, D. H. (2005b), “Experimental investigations of combination effects of installation damage and creep deformation on long-term design strength of geogrids”, Journal of Korean Geosynthetics Society, Vol.4, No.4, pp.23-37.
7
Elias, V., Fishman, K.L., Christopher, B.R. and Berg, R.R. (2009), Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes, Washington, DC, FHWA-NHI-09-087, 146p.
8
German Geotechnical Society (2011), Recommendations for Design and Analysis of Earth Structures using Geosynthetic Reinforcements, EBGEO, pp.24-26.
9
Greenwood, J.H. (2002), “The effect of installation damage on the long-term design strength of a reinforcing geosynthetics”, Geosynthetics International, Vol.9, No.3, pp.247-258.
10.1680/gein.9.0217
10
GSI (2005), “Determination of the long-term design strength of flexible geogrids”, GSI Test Methods GG4(b), Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
11
Han, S. H., Yea, G. G. and Lee, K. W. (2012), “Tensile strength-strain relationship of various geogrids”, Journal of the Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.13, No.2, pp.83-93.
12
Hufenus, R., Rüegger, R., Flum, D. and Sterba, I.J. (2005), “Strength reduction factors due to installation damage of reinforcing geosynthetics”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol.23, No.5, pp.401-424.
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.02.003
13
ISO (1998), “Geotextiles and geotextile-related products - method for installing and extracting samples in soil, and testing specimens in laboratory”, ISO 13437.
14
Koerner, G. R. and Koerner, R. M. (1990), “The installation survivability of geotextiles and geogrids”, Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Den Haag, pp.597-602.
15
KSK ISO 10319 (2007), “Geotextiles− Wide width tensile test”.
16
Park, J. W. and Chun, B. S. (2012), “A study on the evaluation of field installation damage and strength reduction factor of geogrid for reinforced retaining wall”, Journal of Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.13, No.7, pp.5-12.
17
Pinho-Lopes, M., Recker, C., Lopes, M.L. and Müller- Rochholz, J. (2002), “Experimental analysis of the combined effect of installation damage and creep of geosynthetics-New result”, Proc. of the Seventh International Conference on Geosynthetics, Delmas, pp.1539-1544.
18
Public Works Research Center (2013), Geogrid for reinforcement of ground and embankment - T RIGRID EX, Construction Technical Evaluation Certification Report, pp.54-56.
19
Rainey, T. and Barksdale, R. (1993), “Construction induced reduction in tensile strength of polymer geogrids”, Proc. of the Geosynthetics Conference, Vancouver, pp.729-742.
20
Troost, G.H. and Ploeg, N.A. (1990), “Influence of weaving structure and coating on the degree of mechanical damage of reinforcing mats and woven geogrids, caused by different fills, during installation”, Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Den Haag, pp.609-614.
21
Watts, G.R.A. and Brady, K.C. (1994), “Geosynthetics-installation damage and the measure -ment of tensile strength”, Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, pp.1159-1164.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Geosythetics Society
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지반신소재학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지반신소재학회 논문집
  • Volume : 17
  • No :4
  • Pages :225-238
  • Received Date : 2018-11-14
  • Revised Date : 2018-12-10
  • Accepted Date : 2018-12-17
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12814/jkgss.2018.17.4.225
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close